Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 12 Feb 2001 00:17:57 -0200 | From | Rogerio Brito <> | Subject | Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: Apparent instability of reiserfs on 2.4.1 |
| |
On Feb 11 2001, Andi Kleen wrote: > The reiserfs nfs problem in standard 2.4 is very simple -- it'll > barf as soon as you run out of file handle/inode cache. Any workload > that accesses enough files in parallel can trigger it.
I'm just trying to evaluate if I should use reiserfs here or not: is this phenomenon that you describe above happening independently of whether I choose the knfsd or userspace nfsd?
From your message, I got the impression that it would happen with knfsd only, but I'm just checking before I make a wrong decision.
Thanks from a humble (and ignorant) network admin, Roger...
-- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Rogerio Brito - rbrito@iname.com - http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito/ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |