[lkml]   [2001]   [Feb]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: bidirectional named pipe?
Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 03:10:08PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> I would really like it if open() on a socket would be the same
> thing to connect to a socket as a client. I don't think it's a
> good idea to do that for the server side, though, since it would
> have to know about accept() anyway.
> things like this (non-portable hacks) belong in libc surely?

Not if it makes more sense to implement in the kernel. I can't think of
a way to implement it in glibc without races, perhaps you can.


<> at work, <> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.426 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site