Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 07 Dec 2001 17:14:11 -0500 | From | "Christopher Friesen" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] 2.4.16 kernel/printk.c (per processorinitializationcheck) |
| |
David Mosberger wrote: > > >>>>> On Fri, 7 Dec 2001 16:52:07 -0200 (BRST), Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br> said: > > Marcelo> I'm really not willing to apply this kludge... > > Do you agree that it should always be safe to call printk() from C code?
Is it really safe to call this from interrupt handlers? I can think of cases where the time required to print can totally mess stuff up...
Chris
-- Chris Friesen | MailStop: 043/33/F10 Nortel Networks | work: (613) 765-0557 3500 Carling Avenue | fax: (613) 765-2986 Nepean, ON K2H 8E9 Canada | email: cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |