lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Dec]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectStupid PCI Bit-naming convention question

In my attempts to investigate whether or not my m/b is afflicted by the
VIA KT266 hardware bug at device 1106:3099 register 0x95, bits 5,6,7, I
have a dumb question: Namely, how are bits numbered?

I would assume that bits are numbered from smallest value to largest,
indexed at 0, so that bit 7 is the '128' component of a byte and bit 0 is
the '1' component.. correct?



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.052 / U:0.348 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site