[lkml]   [2001]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Coding style - a non-issue
On Sat, 1 Dec 2001 00:14:54 -0500 (EST)
Alexander Viro <> wrote:

> On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> > This is Linux-Kernel. Each developer is on their own on how they pay the
> > their bills. The question is... Why not accept a *driver* that *works* but
> > the source doesn't look so good?
> Because this "works" may very well include exploitable buffer overruns in
> kernel mode. I had seen that - ioctl() assuming that nobody would pass

And: bad code spreads. Anyone who has done infrastructure change in the
kernel sees this: people copy (presumed) working code.

Hence I now lean towards "change EVERYTHING" rather than "wrap old source, add
new", and "fix even if not broken", eg. my "set_bit needs a long" patch which
also changed x86-specific code (where it doesn't matter).

Anyone who quotes me is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.271 / U:19.224 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site