[lkml]   [2001]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Coding style - a non-issue
    On Sat, 1 Dec 2001 00:14:54 -0500 (EST)
    Alexander Viro <> wrote:

    > On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Mike Fedyk wrote:
    > > This is Linux-Kernel. Each developer is on their own on how they pay the
    > > their bills. The question is... Why not accept a *driver* that *works* but
    > > the source doesn't look so good?
    > Because this "works" may very well include exploitable buffer overruns in
    > kernel mode. I had seen that - ioctl() assuming that nobody would pass

    And: bad code spreads. Anyone who has done infrastructure change in the
    kernel sees this: people copy (presumed) working code.

    Hence I now lean towards "change EVERYTHING" rather than "wrap old source, add
    new", and "fix even if not broken", eg. my "set_bit needs a long" patch which
    also changed x86-specific code (where it doesn't matter).

    Anyone who quotes me is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.022 / U:31.508 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site