Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: Linux/Pro -- clusters | Date | Tue, 4 Dec 2001 18:04:12 +0000 (GMT) | From | Alan Cox <> |
| |
> Single additional alloc -> twice as many allocs, two slabs, more cachelines > dirty. This was hashed out on fsdevel, though apparently not to everyone's > satisfaction.
Al Viro's NFS in generic_ip saved me something like 130K of memory.
> > Using generic_ip in its current form has the advantage of being able to > > create a nicely-aligned kmem cache for your private inode data. > > I don't see why that's hard with the combined struct.
Providing you end up with fs->alloc_inode() and the fs allocates a suitable sized inode + private I see no problem. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |