[lkml]   [2001]   [Dec]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Linux/Pro [was Re: Coding style - a non-issue]
>> Larry McVoy <> writes:
>> > then 4->8, etc. By your logic, someone should be sitting down and saying
>> > here is how you get to 128. Other than myself, noone is doing that and
>> > I'm not really a Linux kernel hack, so I don't count.
>> "No one that you know". I'm always surprised that you're able to speak
>> with such confidence. There may be lots of things going on that don't
>> daily report to you.
> Right you are, but... There is also piles of information that I absorb
> on a daily basis, and I'm always willing to be educated. For example,
> you could educate me about all those 128 processor Linux boxes in the
> world and fill in a hole in my knowledge. I'm listening...

SGI has machines bigger than 128 (if memory serves, 1024??) that I thought
had booted Linux. The Sequent/IBM NUMA-Q archictecture now supports Linux
and would go to 64 procs if we removed a few bitmap limitations from the kernel
that have been patched out before (well, actually 60 is easy, 64 would require
some more apic modifications).

Anyway, bigger than 8 way is no pipedream. I'll admit few people could afford
such machines, but they do exist.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:18    [W:0.367 / U:5.588 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site