lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Dec]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable
Andreas Hartmann wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> Again, I did a rsync-operation as described in
> "[2.4.17rc1] Swapping" MID <3C1F4014.2010705@athlon.maya.org>.
>

Some other examples:
I just did a
cp -Rd linux-2.4.16 linux-2.4.17
(with object-files). Before starting this action, I had about 120 MB of
free RAM. During copying - I did nothing else meanwhile, there was 2MB
swap used - and 12 MB of RAM were free. The biggest part of memory was
used for caching - what is ok.
After copying, only 10 MB of memory have been given free again. There
have been 490MB of RAM used now (nearly most for caching).

Outgoing from this situation, I started another little cp-action:
cp -Rd linux-2.4.18pre1 linux-2.4.test
(again including object files).
Result: the swap usage stayed nearly constant, neverthless there have
been 6 accesses to swap.

Now, I deleted the linux-2.4.test-directory with
rm -R linux-2.4.test
This action was very fast (approximately 1s).

Afterwards, a big part of the cache memory has been given free (about
100MB). Now, 122MB of RAM have been free again.

Next example (running after the last):
SuSE run-crons have been running. This means:
-> updatedb
-> sort
-> frcode
-> find
-> mandb

47MB swap used, 2/3 of memory is used for buffers (Don't forget: I've
got 512MB of RAM) and about 30MB of RAM are free.


My observation:
Why does the kernel swap to get free memory for caching / buffering? I
can't see any sense in this action. Wouldn't it be better to shrink the
cashing / buffering-RAM to the amount of memory, which is obviously free?

Swapping should be principally used, if the RAM ends for real memory
(memory, which is used for running applications). First of all, the
memory-usage of cache and buffers should be reduced before starting to
swap IMHO.

Or would it be possible, to implement more than one swapping strategy,
which could be configured during make menuconfig? This would give the
user the chance to find the best swapping strategy for his purpose.



Regards,
Andreas Hartmann

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:14    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans