Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 29 Dec 2001 12:13:58 -0600 (CST) | From | Oliver Xymoron <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] rlimit_nproc |
| |
On Sat, 29 Dec 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On December 27, 2001 10:35 pm, Legacy Fishtank wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 12:35:38PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > Also worthwhile for automation is an md5sum or similar (for verifying that > > > the mail made it though the mail system unscathed). A pgp signature would > > > be even better, of course - especially useful as I suspect it would be > > > good to also cc the things to some patch-list, and having a clear identity > > > on the sender is always a good idea in these things. > > > > I've been thinking that a "patches@kernel.org" dumping ground would be > > useful. > > > > This is NOT intended as a patch tracker. This is NOT intended as a > > substitution for submitting the patch to you, but instead intended > > as a patch archive that doesn't go away. We have seen linux-kernel > > archives come and go, or drop messages. But a patch archive would be > > useful... I'm not sure a mailing list proper is right for the job, > > since I want to support the reception and archiving of multi-megabyte > > patches at times. > > Exactly what I was thinking of: 'linux-patches@kernel.org'. The idea is, > instead of putting [PATCH] on your subject line and cc'ing it to Linus, you > mail it to linux-patches with a cc to lkml if you like (depending on size of > patch, how interesting, etc). In any event, linux-patches will forward a > copy to Linus.
You of course need something like -2.4 and -2.5.
-- "Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.."
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |