lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Dec]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [kbuild-devel] Re: State of the new config & build system
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 05:31:51PM -0500, Eric S. Raymond wrote:

> When I talk about "rules that use architecture symbols to suppress
> things like bus types" I have in mind things like this:
[snip]
> unless (ISA or PCI) suppress dependent IDE

Just a minor point, but what about non-PCI/ISA ide?

> unless PCI suppress dependent USB HOTPLUG_PCI

And there's hope this will die soon too (USB) ...

> unless (X86 or ALPHA or MIPS32 or PPC) suppress usb

or SPARC or SPARC64 (iirc) or ARM (once !pci usb is allowed)...

> unless (X86 and PCI and EXPERIMENTAL) or PPC or ARM or SPARC suppress dependent IEEE1394

Wouldn't the experimental be global? And maybe the PCI too?

> It seems to me *extremely* unlikely that a typical patch from a PPC maintainer
> would mess with any of these! They're rules that are likely to be written
> once at the time a new port is added to the tree and seldom or ever changed
> afterwards.

But they will be modified for new arch X, or when constraint X (like
PCI) is removed.

--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:14    [W:0.330 / U:1.892 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site