lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Dec]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: State of the new config & build system
    Em Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 03:44:10PM +1100, Keith Owens escreveu:
    > On Fri, 28 Dec 2001 20:21:39 -0800,
    > Mike Castle <dalgoda@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
    > >On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 10:58:03PM -0500, Legacy Fishtank wrote:
    > >> s/break/update dependencies/
    > >>
    > >> I assumed this was blindingly obvious, but I guess not.
    > >
    > >To YOU and other kernel hackers, yes.
    > >
    > >But not to everyone.
    > >
    > >Plus, as I understand it, it will be faster to:
    > >
    > >apply a patch and rebuild with kbuild 2.5
    > >
    > >than to:
    > >
    > >apply a patch, make dep && make bzImage.
    > >
    > >Correct?
    >
    > As long as the patch does not change an include file that is used a
    > lot, yes, a patch and make will be significantly faster using kbuild

    And thats something I encourage people to work on: to reduce the includes
    dependencies hell, I hope to have the cleanup I did to include/net/sock.h
    removing the protocol specific headers from there and the cleanup that
    Daniel Phillips is doing in include/net/fs.h in the tree soon, of course if
    there's not issues, that we're very interesting to know.

    - Arnaldo
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:14    [W:0.043 / U:0.024 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site