[lkml]   [2001]   [Dec]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: The direction linux is taking
    Russell King writes:
    > On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 04:33:50PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
    > > Tridge wrote the system you describe, several years ago. Its called
    > > jitterbug but it doesnt help because Linus wont use it
    > Speaking as someone who _does_ use a system for tracking patches, I
    > believe that patch management systems are a right pain in the arse.
    > If the quality of patches aren't good, then it throws you into a
    > problem. You have to provide people with a reason why you discarded
    > their patch, which provides people with the perfect opportunity to
    > immediately start bugging you about exactly how to make it better.
    > If you get lots of such patches, eventually you've got a mailbox of
    > people wanting to know how to make their patches better.

    So you just do what Linus does: delete those questions without
    replying. No matter what system you use, if you want to avoid an
    overflowing mailbox, you either have to silently drop patches, and/or
    silently drop questions/requests/begging letters. There isn't really
    much difference between the two.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:18    [W:0.040 / U:1.620 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site