[lkml]   [2001]   [Dec]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: The direction linux is taking
Russell King writes:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 04:33:50PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Tridge wrote the system you describe, several years ago. Its called
> > jitterbug but it doesnt help because Linus wont use it
> Speaking as someone who _does_ use a system for tracking patches, I
> believe that patch management systems are a right pain in the arse.
> If the quality of patches aren't good, then it throws you into a
> problem. You have to provide people with a reason why you discarded
> their patch, which provides people with the perfect opportunity to
> immediately start bugging you about exactly how to make it better.
> If you get lots of such patches, eventually you've got a mailbox of
> people wanting to know how to make their patches better.

So you just do what Linus does: delete those questions without
replying. No matter what system you use, if you want to avoid an
overflowing mailbox, you either have to silently drop patches, and/or
silently drop questions/requests/begging letters. There isn't really
much difference between the two.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:18    [W:0.220 / U:5.208 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site