[lkml]   [2001]   [Dec]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: some 2.4.17 vs. 2.4.17-rmap8 vs. lowmem analysis
On 26 Dec 2001, safemode wrote:

> Ok, ran the same test again this time limiting ram to 32MB to really
> work the vm. Unfortunately 2.4.17-rmap8 couldn't handle the vm load and
> locked up during a swapin. So obviously there is no real data on it.

Yes, the rmap patch still has a known livelock. I haven't
quite tracked it down yet, but am looking into it whenever
I have the time.


Shortwave goes a long way: #swl

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:14    [W:2.088 / U:0.872 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site