[lkml]   [2001]   [Dec]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: file names ?
On December 25, 2001 12:25, James Stevenson wrote:
> a small example is a smallish ext2 / filesystem
> and the rest being a fat filesystem to that
> it can be accessed from both windows and linux.
> and there is not enough space on the ext2 to compile a kernel anymore.

Case-insensitivity is not your only problem. 'ln -s' is used multiple times
during the kernel build process, I'd like to see a FAT filesystem try to
handle that. I haven't checked, but the compile might also depend on the
executable bit actually working, and being able to rename and unlink files in
use. Even with filenames that do not collide in a case-insensitive namespace,
the build will fail.

The kernel compile requires a POSIX filesystem, which is a completely sane
demand. I'd go as far as saying that all 'real' filesystems are POSIX
compliant, and that non-POSIX filesystems should only be used for simple data
file storage.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:14    [W:0.069 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site