lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Dec]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Configure.help editorial policy
Date
On Friday 21 December 2001 01:40 pm, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> David Garfield <garfield@irving.iisd.sra.com>:
> > Eric S. Raymond writes:

> > Choice of kB vs KB vs KiB vs KKB could also be used in some places in
> > the kernel. For instance, /proc/meminfo currently shows "kB".
>
> What, and *encourage* non-uniform terminology? No, I won't do that.
> Better to have a single standard set of abbreviations, no matter how
> ugly, than this.

find . -name "*.?" | xargs grep MiB | wc
46 lines, half of which seem to live in "jedec_probe.c".

find . -name "*.?" | xargs grep -w MB | wc
302 lines. And that's just upper case, whole word, not "MBs" or "Mb" or
any other fun little variation...

find . -name "*.?" | xargs grep -i MEGABYTE | wc
31 lines.

find . -name "*.?" | xargs grep -i MEBIBYTE | wc
1 line, and it's a comment saying it's NOT being used (along with one
of the MiB hits).

If you're going with a uniform terminology argument, you should drop MiB
altogether. Unless you want to submit a patch to the kernel to standardize
all the other occurences everywhere else? :)

Rob
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:14    [W:0.339 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site