[lkml]   [2001]   [Dec]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: editorial policy
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 03:47:50PM -0500, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:

On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 06:36:22PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:

> Also, a GB of disk space really is 2^10 * 10^6 ...
> Better make sure we get it consistent ... *runs like hell*

I always thought they'd like to count the size of disks in bits...
man, don't you really want on of those new 240Gbit disks? I hear
they can pull in a sustained 200Gbit/s on reads!

But what Rik points out shows that right now there is ambiguity
BECAUSE OF LACK OF STANDARDIZATION --- because GB is vague at the very
best, disk manufactures get to claim nice marketing numbers.

As for bits/second sort of thing, this is common in networking of
course, especially when they talk about raw data rate and ignore
framing overhead and such like.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:14    [W:0.070 / U:1.696 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site