lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Dec]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: PATCH 2.4.17.2: make ext2 smaller
On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 08:47:58AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Ingo Oeser wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 08:03:27AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > And if !MODULE, then even EXPORT_SYMBOL symbols can become static, if
~~~~~~~[1]
> > > they are not used outside the compilation unit.
> >
> > If your compilation units are greater than the current
> > granularity of modules: Yes.
> >
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL() symbols are Kernel-API, which is also exported to
> > 3rd-party vendors with binary modules. So it makes little sense
> > to me to make them static.
>
> If !MODULES, modules are not supported by that kernel. It is completely
~~~~~~~~[2]
> safe to make such functions static, if not used outside the compilation
> unit. For all other cases, it is indeed wrong to make such them static.

Ahh! I thought with [1] you meant, that the compilation unit is
not compiled as a module. But with [2] it makes a lot of sense of
course ;-)

Sorry for my confusion.

Regards

Ingo Oeser
--
Science is what we can tell a computer. Art is everything else. --- D.E.Knuth
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.086 / U:0.172 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site