lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Dec]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: PATCH 2.4.17.2: make ext2 smaller
    On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 08:47:58AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
    > Ingo Oeser wrote:
    > >
    > > On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 08:03:27AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
    > > > And if !MODULE, then even EXPORT_SYMBOL symbols can become static, if
    ~~~~~~~[1]
    > > > they are not used outside the compilation unit.
    > >
    > > If your compilation units are greater than the current
    > > granularity of modules: Yes.
    > >
    > > EXPORT_SYMBOL() symbols are Kernel-API, which is also exported to
    > > 3rd-party vendors with binary modules. So it makes little sense
    > > to me to make them static.
    >
    > If !MODULES, modules are not supported by that kernel. It is completely
    ~~~~~~~~[2]
    > safe to make such functions static, if not used outside the compilation
    > unit. For all other cases, it is indeed wrong to make such them static.

    Ahh! I thought with [1] you meant, that the compilation unit is
    not compiled as a module. But with [2] it makes a lot of sense of
    course ;-)

    Sorry for my confusion.

    Regards

    Ingo Oeser
    --
    Science is what we can tell a computer. Art is everything else. --- D.E.Knuth
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:3.168 / U:0.000 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site