[lkml]   [2001]   [Dec]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Linux/Pro [was Re: Coding style - a non-issue]
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Alan Cox" <>
    To: <>
    Cc: "Alan Cox" <>; "Larry McVoy" <>;
    "Davide Libenzi" <>; "Andrew Morton"
    <>; "Daniel Phillips" <>; "Henning
    Schmiedehausen" <>; "Jeff Garzik"
    <>; <>
    Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 11:42 AM
    Subject: Re: Linux/Pro [was Re: Coding style - a non-issue]

    > > > Question: What happens when people stick 8 threads of execution on a
    die with
    > > > a single L2 cache ?
    > >
    > > That had been already researched. Gogin bejoind 2 threads on a single
    > > CPU
    > > engine doesn't give you very much... The first step is giving about 25%
    > > the second only about 5%. There are papers in the IBM research magazine
    > > on
    > The IBM papers make certain architectural assumptions. With some of the
    > tiny modern CPU cores its going to perfectly viable to put 4 or 8 of them
    > on one die. At that point cccluster still has to have cluster nodes
    > to 8 way

    Semiconductor technology will push this way because it's no longer possible
    to propagate a signal across the die in one clock cycle. This means
    interlocking becomes vastly more complicated. The simple solution puts
    several CPU cores on the die, each able to interlock in one clock but
    memory over several clocks.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:18    [W:0.036 / U:6.032 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site