[lkml]   [2001]   [Dec]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: buffer/memory strangeness in 2.4.16 / 2.4.17pre2
I verified this by throwing in 1GB of swap. It does lose the buffers 
eventually, but it does so under great pains. However, since I do have
*plenty* memory and slow disks, I prefer running without swap. These settings
appear to be broken (2.4.13 worked!).

Without swap, I would have to reboot every day to make my simulation happy.-
But it needs to allocate and use *only* about 300 of 768MB which *should* be
available, only because the night before a cron job kicked off 'updatdb'
filling the buffers.

Without swap, it really is *this* bad in 2.4.16 and the latest pre-releases.
RAM is full of buffers that just won't disappear to make room for more
important stuff. My simulation gets killed *every time* until I reboot to
free 'buffers' or add swap. (This makes everything slower in total.)



On Sunday 02 December 2001 13:17, Rik wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Dec 2001, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > You'll find that if you push the machine really hard - allocate
> > 1.5x physical memory and touch it all then the VM will, eventually,
> > with great reluctance and much swapping, relinquish the 30 megabytes
> > of buffercache memory. But it's out of whack.
> This is an expected (and very bad) side effect of use-once.
> > If we put anon pages on the active list instead, then shrink_caches()
> > and refill_inactive() start to do something, and they move that stale
> > old buffercache memory onto the inactive list where it can be freed.
> This would fix the problem of not being able to evict stale
> active pages, but I have no idea if it would unbalance
> something else.
> > This is just a random hack. I don't understand what's going on in
> > the VM, let alone what's *supposed* to be going on. And given the
> > state of documentation available to us, I never will.
> The balancing in Andrea's VM is just too subtle to understand
> without docs, that is, if there is any particular idea behind
> it and it isn't just experimentation.
> regards,
> Rik
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.033 / U:2.896 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site