Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 18 Dec 2001 09:12:43 +0000 ( ) | From | John Heil <> | Subject | Re: Scheduler ( was: Just a second ) ... |
| |
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 14:09:16 +0000 (GMT) > From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> > To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com> > Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>, > Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>, > Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> > Subject: Re: Scheduler ( was: Just a second ) ... > > > to CD-RW disks without having to know about things like "ide-scsi" etc, > > and do it sanely over different bus architectures etc. > > > > The scheduler simply isn't that important. > > The scheduler is eating 40-60% of the machine on real world 8 cpu workloads. > That isn't going to go away by sticking heads in sand.
What % of a std 2 cpu, do you think it eats?
> - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >
- ----------------------------------------------------------------- John Heil South Coast Software Custom systems software for UNIX and IBM MVS mainframes 1-714-774-6952 johnhscs@sc-software.com http://www.sc-software.com -----------------------------------------------------------------
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |