Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre8 | Date | Mon, 10 Dec 2001 23:32:51 +0000 (GMT) | From | Alan Cox <> |
| |
> I'd like to suggest again having patches include change logs. The basic > idea is for a patch to contain a file like patch.foo in the top-level that > includes the changelog entry and the maintainer runs a release script that
personally I think Marcelo is doing the right thing, which is actually applying the needed patches rather than trying to do half of ISO9001 to keep a few people happy.
> them. This would make it much easier for people to know the details of > what got fixed without further burdening The Maintainer.
<arrogant mode> If you are qualified to hack on the affected code you are able to understand the one liner change summary </arrogant mode> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |