lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Dec]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Did someone try to boot 2.4.16 on a 386 ? [SOLVED]
Date
On Sat, 1 Dec 2001 10:47:33 +0100 (CET), 
=?iso-8859-1?q?willy=20tarreau?= <wtarreau@yahoo.fr> wrote:
>Keith Owens wrote
>> Even if you
>> never compile in tree1 and tree2 at the same time,
>> when you switch back and forth between trees you
>> will get semi-random time stamp changes.
>
>so a recursive touch before a make in such a tree
>should be safer ?

Yes, as long as you only touch the source files, not any objects that
have already been created.

As I mentioned before, all these problems are solved in kbuild 2.5.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/kbuild/, Package kbuild-2.5. I just
putting the 1.10 release together, against kernel 2.4.16.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.063 / U:3.440 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site