Messages in this thread |  | | From | (Erik Hensema) | Subject | Re: Yet another design for /proc. Or actually /kernel. | Date | 8 Nov 2001 08:56:21 GMT |
| |
John Levon (moz@compsoc.man.ac.uk) wrote: >On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 02:41:26PM -0500, William Knop wrote: > >> You really consider this discussion to be unimportant? Granted, the lack of >> organization in /proc is not a bug, but keeping the kernel organized is part >> of maintenence. Like cleaning my room-- it's not a showstopper if it is >> messy, but it is nicer and easier to work in when neat. > >Like cleaning your room, talking endlessly about how doesn't get you anywhere. >Show some code ...
Just starting to code without giving much thought into it give us... the current /proc. It may be a good idea to actually design the thing this time.
-- Erik Hensema (erik@hensema.net) I'm on the list, no need to Cc: me, though I appreciate one if your mailer doesn't support the References header. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |