[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: speed difference between using hard-linked and modular drives?

> > we should fix this by trying to allocate continuous physical memory if
> > possible, and fall back to vmalloc() only if this allocation fails.
> Check -aa. A patch to do that has been in there for some time now.

We also need a way to satisfy very large allocations for the hashes (eg
the pagecache hash). On a 32G machine we get awful performance on the
pagecache hash because we can only get an order 9 allocation out of

When switching to vmalloc the hash is large enough to be useful:

As pointed out by Davem and Ingo we should try and avoid vmalloc here
due to tlb trashing.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.180 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site