Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 8 Nov 2001 17:18:04 +0000 | From | Russell King <> | Subject | Re: Module Licensing? (thinking a little more) |
| |
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 06:00:45PM +0100, Drizzt Do'Urden wrote: > Yes, clause 3.a) "machine readable source code". A .s file is, "machine > readable source code" by the assembler and by people that have enough time > to lost.. It is like head.S, but using numeric labels and other stuff of > that kind.
Sigh.
"The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work for making modifications to it."
-- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |