lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: ext3 vs resiserfs vs xfs
    On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 04:36:13PM -0700, D. Stimits wrote:
    > It might be interesting if modules.conf had a scheme similar to
    > versioning for System.map. E.G., search first for
    > /etc/modules.conf-2.4.9-6, and if not found, go for /etc/modules.conf
    > (as a fallback in case version-specific didn't exist).

    It does, more or less, if you use the if directives:

    if -f /etc/modules.conf-2.4.9-6
    include /etc/modules.conf-2.4.9-6
    else
    [regular stuff here
    endif

    Or better yet, something like

    option foo one=this two=that
    if `uname -4` > 2.4.x
    add option foo three=blah
    endif

    mrc
    --
    Mike Castle dalgoda@ix.netcom.com www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
    We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
    fatal ("You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different"); -- gcc
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:12    [W:0.047 / U:0.636 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site