Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 6 Nov 2001 15:42:40 -0700 | From | Erik Andersen <> | Subject | Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc |
| |
On Tue Nov 06, 2001 at 11:33:49PM +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > On Tue, 2001-11-06 15:28:26 -0700, Erik Andersen <andersen@codepoet.org> > wrote in message <20011106152826.C31923@codepoet.org>: > > On Tue Nov 06, 2001 at 07:24:13PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote: > > > PROCESSOR=0 > > > VENDOR_ID=GenuineIntel > > > CPU_FAMILY=6 > > > MODEL=6 > > > MODEL_NAME="Celeron (Mendocino)" > > > ..... > > PROCESSOR=1 > ... > > > > . /proc/cpuinfo > > > > I think we have a winner! If we could establish this > > as policy that would be _sweet_! > > What do you expect on a SMP system?
How about something like: NUMBER_CPUS=8 VENDOR_ID_0=GenuineIntel CPU_FAMILY_0=6 MODEL_0=6 MODEL_NAME_0="Celeron (Mendocino)" ...
-Erik
-- Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/ --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |