Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 06 Nov 2001 15:46:43 -0700 | From | Ben Greear <> | Subject | Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc |
| |
Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Tue, 2001-11-06 15:28:26 -0700, Erik Andersen <andersen@codepoet.org> > wrote in message <20011106152826.C31923@codepoet.org>: > >>On Tue Nov 06, 2001 at 07:24:13PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote: >> >>>PROCESSOR=0 >>>VENDOR_ID=GenuineIntel >>>CPU_FAMILY=6 >>>MODEL=6 >>>MODEL_NAME="Celeron (Mendocino)" >>>..... >>> > > PROCESSOR=1
or PROCESSOR1=1
Either way, it's still trivial to parse with perl or c/c++/Java and probably a dozen other languages I don't know...
Ben
> ... > > >>>. /proc/cpuinfo >>> >>I think we have a winner! If we could establish this >>as policy that would be _sweet_! >> > > What do you expect on a SMP system? > > MfG, JBG > >
-- Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> <Ben_Greear AT excite.com> President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |