Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 5 Nov 2001 19:08:26 -0200 (BRST) | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: Scheduling of low-priority background processes |
| |
On Mon, 5 Nov 2001, Thomas Koeller wrote:
> So here is my question: > > Some operating systems I have been working with had a scheduling > policy different from what I find in Linux.
I'm not sure what you want to ask, though I guess you're not too happy about the fact that niced processes still get a lot of CPU time in Linux ;)
If this was what you wanted to say, this is something I've been planning to fix for a while and, now that my VM has been removed from the kernel, I'll have some time for too...
cheers,
Rik -- DMCA, SSSCA, W3C? Who cares? http://thefreeworld.net/ (volunteers needed)
http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |