[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]
    On Mon, 5 Nov 2001, Ben Greear wrote:

    > I would rather have a header block, as well as docs in the
    > source. If the header cannot easily explain it, then the header
    > can have a URL or other link to the full explanation.

    I think you've hit the core of the problem. There is no magical
    bullet which will stop badly written userland programs from
    breaking, but the kernel developers should have the courtesy
    of providing documentation for the /proc files so the writers
    of userland programs can have an idea what to expect.

    The inline docbook stuff in the kernel should make it easy for
    kernel developers to keep code and documentation in sync, while
    also making it easy to generate documentation in a format which
    is nice to read ;)


    DMCA, SSSCA, W3C? Who cares? (volunteers needed)

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:12    [W:0.041 / U:1.116 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site