[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: VM: qsbench numbers

On Sun, 4 Nov 2001, Lorenzo Allegrucci wrote:
> I begin with the last Linus' kernel, three runs and kswapd CPU
> time appended.

It's interesting how your numbers decrease with more swap-space. That,
together with the fact that the "more swap space" case also degrades the
second time around seems to imply that we leave swap-cache pages around
after they aren't used.

Does "free" after a run has completed imply that there's still lots of
swap used? We _should_ have gotten rid of it at "free_swap_and_cache()"
time, but if we missed it..

What happens if you make the "vm_swap_full()" define in <linux/swap.h> be
unconditionally defined to "1"? That should make us be more aggressive
about freeing those swap-cache pages, and it would be interesting to see
if it also stabilizes your numbers.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:12    [W:0.051 / U:0.180 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site