lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Subject[file interface] Re: Module Licensing?
Date
On Tuesday 30 October 2001 18:27, Timur Tabi wrote:
> TimO wrote:
> > Ugghh! Don't confuse/equate MODULE_LICENSE with EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_ONLY;
> > two different animals, two differnet goals. See archives for more info.
>
> What happens is a module is distributed as a combination of open-source .c
> files and closed-source .o files. That is, it's "mixed source" - part of
> the driver is open-source and part is closed-source. What happens if the
> open-source version of the driver is the only code that uses GPL-only
> symbols. How is that handled?
>

This is the approach I would use:

Kernel module:
Exports a standard interface like file or terminal (or several...)
GPL all of this work.
Make it useful for others too - and you may sell some additional HW.

Propritary code (user application):
Uses standard file operations - like fopen, seek, ...
The needed headers are LGPL and thus safe.

Comments?


/RogerL
--
Roger Larsson
Skellefteå
Sweden
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:12    [W:0.091 / U:2.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site