[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] task_struct colouring ...
    On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Alan Cox wrote:

    > > So You like the idea of stocking structure pointers inside CPU registers
    > > or I missed Your point ?
    > > The proposed implementation is "uniform" between architectures, that's my
    > > point.
    > An uniform implementation for a totally non uniform set of processors. Not
    > actually useful. The x86 is one of the few cpus so short of registers that
    > current in a global register is not a win performancewise.

    The point is why store kernel pointers in global registers when You can
    achieve the same functionality, with a smaller patch, that does not need
    to be recoded for each CPU, without using global registers.

    > The cache behaviour also heavily depends on the processor. In paticular the
    > problem with having to align stacks to do current tricks is absent on non
    > x86 processors so they can use properly coloured stacks.
    > current is far too critical to generalise

    This is the diff for current :

    static inline struct task_struct * get_current(void)
    - struct task_struct *current;
    - __asm__("andl %%esp,%0; ":"=r" (current) : "0" (~8191UL));
    - return current;
    + unsigned long *tskptr;
    + __asm__("andl %%esp,%0; ":"=r" (tskptr) : "0" (~8191UL));
    + return (struct task_struct *) *tskptr;

    - Davide

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.024 / U:5.424 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site