Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 1 Dec 2001 01:03:59 +0100 (CET) | From | Sven Koch <> | Subject | Re: Device (LAN Cards) Naming |
| |
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 08:57:28PM +0100, Sven Koch wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Mauricio Culibrk wrote: > > > > > Is it possible to define a name for each interface instead of having > > > eth0, eth1 etc? > > > > ip link set eth0 down > > ip link set eth0 name buggy > > ip link set buggy up
> Does the new name work with ifconfig?
Yes, it does. And with firewalling, shaping, etc - with everything that uses ethX.
Only programs that think they are smarter and use hardcoded interface-names/schemes/lists are obviously broken.
c'ya sven
--
The Internet treats censorship as a routing problem, and routes around it. (John Gilmore on http://www.cygnus.com/~gnu/)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |