[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] smarter atime updates

On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> Well, just doing a code check of the update_atime() and UPDATE_ATIME()
> users, and they are all in readlink(), follow_link(), open_namei(),
> and various fs _readdir() codes. None of them (AFAICS) depend on the
> mark_inode_dirty() as a side-effect. This means it should be safe.

More importantly, _if_ somebody depended on the side effects, they'd have
been thwarted by the "noatime" mount option anyway, so any such bug would
not be a new bug.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.079 / U:0.220 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site