[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Coding style - a non-issue
    John Kodis wrote:
    > On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 02:00:18PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
    > > Human beings know and understand context, and can use it
    > > effectively. 'idx' or 'i' or 'bh' may make perfect sense in
    > > context. There is absolutely no need for
    > > JournalBHThatIsStoredAndSyncedWithSuperblock.

    JounalBH would be far better than i or idx.

    > Mathematics has a rich tradition of using short variable names such as
    > "pi" rather than something like "circle-circumference-to-diameter-ratio".
    > They keep formulas from becoming unreadably long, and have a meaning
    > which is well understood in context. While the long version may more
    > self-explainatory, it's the short form which is universally preferred.

    While 'pi', 'e', 'theta', 'phi', etc. are universally understood, things
    like 'i', 'a', and 'idx' are not. I can use these for anything I want
    and even for more than one thing, and they say nothing about what they
    are for. 'i', 'j', etc. are fine as loop counters and array indexes
    where their meaning is apparent by context, but are _not_ fine in other
    situations. You (or the person that wrote the code) may think that the
    name is perfectly fine, but someone else that thinks a bit different may

    Paul G. Allen
    UNIX Admin II ('til Dec. 3)/FlUnKy At LaRgE (forever!)
    Akamai Technologies, Inc.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:3.527 / U:0.080 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site