[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] 2.5 PROPOSAL: Replacement for current /proc of shit.
On Sat, 3 Nov 2001 12:47:08 +0100
Tim Jansen <> wrote:
> I do see the advantages of using strings in proc, and maybe there is another
> solution: keep the type information out of the proc filesystem and save it
> in a file similar to, together with a description for a file.
> I just don't know how to ensure that they are in sync.

The same argument applies for module parameters when they become boot parameters
(handwave reference to my previous patch). IMHO we should use a source-strainer
like the current Documentation/DocBook/ stuff does to extract these and consolidate

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:12    [W:0.353 / U:0.228 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site