[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] 2.5 PROPOSAL: Replacement for current /proc of shit.
On Sat, 3 Nov 2001 wrote:

> > solution: keep the type information out of the proc filesystem and save it
> > in a file similar to, together with a description for a
> file.
> It would always be possible to build a front end to the /proc file
> system.

The approach taken by powertweak ( was to
use an XML description of /proc to define types etc. It's worked out
quite well, and has the added advantage of being buzzword compliant 8)


| Dave Jones.
| SuSE Labs

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:12    [W:0.066 / U:1.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site