Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 3 Nov 2001 14:36:02 +0100 (CET) | From | Dave Jones <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] 2.5 PROPOSAL: Replacement for current /proc of shit. |
| |
On Sat, 3 Nov 2001 Telford002@aol.com wrote:
> > solution: keep the type information out of the proc filesystem and save it > > in a file similar to Configure.help, together with a description for a > file. > It would always be possible to build a front end to the /proc file > system.
The approach taken by powertweak (http://www..powertweak.org) was to use an XML description of /proc to define types etc. It's worked out quite well, and has the added advantage of being buzzword compliant 8)
Dave.
-- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |