[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] 2.5 PROPOSAL: Replacement for current /proc of shit.
In a message dated 11/3/01 6:47:18 AM Eastern Standard Time, 

> On Saturday 03 November 2001 00:31, you wrote:
> > Hmm, I'd argue that a GUI tool would be fairly useless without knowing
> what
> > the values meant anwyay, to give help, in which case you might as well
> know
> > the types.
> Take, as an example, the compression module parameter of the PWC (Philips
> Webcam) driver. Currently you can specify a value between 0 for
> and 3 for high compression. If a GUI shows me that only values between 0
> 3 are allowed I could guess that I have to enter "3" for high compression
> without searching for the documentation. It would be even better if I
> select four strings, "none", "low", "medium" and "high".
> I do see the advantages of using strings in proc, and maybe there is
> solution: keep the type information out of the proc filesystem and save it
> in a file similar to, together with a description for a
> I just don't know how to ensure that they are in sync.
It would always be possible to build a front end to the /proc file

Joachim Martillo
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:12    [W:0.027 / U:0.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site