Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 3 Nov 2001 18:08:03 +0100 (CET) | From | Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <> | Subject | Re: [khttpd-users] khttpd vs tux |
| |
> Hi do you know about what traffic you are talking ?
Yes. I know.
> Between 200Mps and 4Gps this means you would on the > max Limit Transver abaout 400MB each second. > And on the lower limit 20MB. > > I think that you shouldn't look for an software web server > but an GOOD hardware server ( or load balancer ), but i think > then there is khttpd the right choice.
I don't think good hardware is enough. I mean - I can probably strap up twenty cool servers from some hardware producer, cluster them together with some cool software and blah blah blah, but I can't use that money. I need a good solution - not low-cost, but still lower...
So - good hardware and good software.
--- Computers are like air conditioners. They stop working when you open Windows.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |