Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sat, 3 Nov 2001 17:43:29 +0100 (CET) | From | Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <> | Subject | Re: [khttpd-users] khttpd vs tux |
| |
> tux is more advanced than khttpd. It's also more intrusive to the kernel as > far as core changes are concerned. These changes allow for higher > performance, but you'll only notice that if you want to fill a gigabit line > or more.....
Are there any good reasons why to run khttpd, then? What I need is a server serving something between 50 and 500 concurrent clients - each downloading at 4-8Mbps.
Which one would be best? Anyone have an idea?
thanks
roy
--- Computers are like air conditioners. They stop working when you open Windows.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |