Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 29 Nov 2001 07:44:51 -0800 (PST) | From | (Colonel) |
| |
From: Colonel <klink@clouddancer.com> To: irajasek@in.ibm.com CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-reply-to: <OF8DFA00F6.3DAC22D2-ON65256B31.003CB38A@in.ibm.com> (irajasek@in.ibm.com) Subject: Re: Routing table problems Reply-to: klink@clouddancer.com References: <OF8DFA00F6.3DAC22D2-ON65256B31.003CB38A@in.ibm.com>
From: "Rajasekhar Inguva" <irajasek@in.ibm.com> Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 17:17:48 +0530
I am facing a problem ( ???, maybe it works that way, but i really dont know ) with regards to routing table behavior when using ifconfig on a network interface.
1) netstat -nr Shows my default gateway for network 0.0.0.0
2) ifconfig eth0 down
3) netstat -nr No entry for the default gateway is shown ( understandable )
4) ifconfig eth0 up
After the the 4'th command, my interface is up and has it's IP address set correctly. But .....
netstat -nr does not show my default gateway for network 0.0.0.0 !!. Pinging any IP outside of my subnet, results in "Network is unreachable" error.
While the linux kernel is certainly omnipotent, it's crystal ball is sometimes hazy. How would it know what the default gateway should be??? Typically after the interface is configured, you command:
/sbin/route add default gw $GATEWAY netmask 0.0.0.0 metric 1
Some routing daemons will handle that for you, but even they need appropriate configuration.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |