lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: About 2.4.16
Date
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 12:51:52 -0800, Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
wrote:

>On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 04:04:49PM +0100, pil@mailnet.de wrote:
>> Martin Eriksson wrote:
>> >
>>
>> >
>> > Oh.. 2.4.13 was pretty usable too, so maybe 3 times slower?
>> >
>>
>> Not for me. I reported an hfs-bug for 2.4.12 up to 2.4.14. So 6 times
>> slower would be the best for the users and - I guess - developers too.
>>
>
>more/faster -pre and less/slower releases.

The true limiting factor is getting an adaquate test environments run.
Slowing releases down wouldn't increase that much..

john alvord
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.077 / U:4.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site