[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: RFC: ethernet links should remember routes the same as addresses
In clouddancer.list.kernel, you wrote:
>I just wanted to get some opinions on this for possible inclusion in 2.5.
>Alexey, if you have any comments...
>The scenario is as follows:
>Suppose I have a fancy routing setup, dynamically configured by different
>binaries, scripts, etc, complete with multiple addresses per link, additional
>routing rules and tables specified using iproute2, etc.
>Does this sound like a good idea? How hard would this be to implement (not
>knowing what the current code looks like, I don't know how this would be done)?

Most routing daemons handle your problem just fine. Perhaps you
should look into those daemons first, try 'bird' for instance.

Windows 2001: "I'm sorry Dave ... I'm afraid I can't do that."

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.029 / U:0.392 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site