[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] remove BKL from llseek

On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Anton Blanchard wrote:

> The dbench-o-matic results from removing the BKL from llseek can be
> found here:
> Same hardware as the earlier test, 12 way ppc64. The patch is pretty
> dumb, I just pushed the kernel lock down into the llseek methods and
> only replaced it with the inode semaphore in generic_llseek. Im sure
> Al will have a better fix for 2.5, I just wanted to highlight the
> problem :)

yeah i did that once (about a year ago or more) and it was rejected, cant
remember why :-) But it's indeed an important optimization and it shows up
in dbench overhead.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.039 / U:0.152 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site