[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Unresponiveness of 2.4.16

On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Andrew Morton wrote:

> Torrey Hoffman wrote:
> >
> > I've running 2.4.16 with this VM patch combined with your
> > 2.4.15-pre7-low-latency patch from (it applied with a
> > little fuzz, no rejects). Is this a combination that you would feel
> > comfortable with?
> Should be OK. There is a possibility of livelock when you have
> a lot of dirty buffers against multiple devices.

Could you please describe this one ?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:18    [W:0.053 / U:2.660 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site