Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 28 Nov 2001 16:09:41 -0200 (BRST) | From | Marcelo Tosatti <> | Subject | Re: Unresponiveness of 2.4.16 |
| |
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Torrey Hoffman wrote: > > > > I've running 2.4.16 with this VM patch combined with your > > 2.4.15-pre7-low-latency patch from www.zip.com.au. (it applied with a > > little fuzz, no rejects). Is this a combination that you would feel > > comfortable with? > > Should be OK. There is a possibility of livelock when you have > a lot of dirty buffers against multiple devices.
Could you please describe this one ?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |