lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Block I/O Enchancements, 2.5.1-pre2
On Tue, Nov 27 2001, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 05:04:46PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > >
> > > Is there a description of the new block layer and its interface to
> > > block device drivers somewhere? That would be helpful, since Ben
> > > Herrenschmidt and I are going to have to convert several
> > > powermac-specific drivers.
> >
> > Jens has something written up, which he sent to me as an introduction to
> > the patch. I'll send that out unless he does a cleaned-up version, but I'd
> > actually prefer for him to do the sending. Jens?
> >
> > Linus
> >
>
>
> Linus/Jens,
>
> I've just completed my review of submit_bio and the changes to
> generic_make_request and I have some questions for whomever
> can answer.
>
> 1. The changes made to submit_bh indicate I can now send long
> chains of variable block size requests to the I/O layer similiar
> to the capability of Windows 2000 and NetWare I/O subsystems.

Yes, you can build generically a single I/O unit that spans up to 256
pages. If you bypass the bio_alloc/bvec_alloc mechanism, the sky is the
limit. Beware that a really big bio may need to be split up in the end
for devices that can't handle them that big.

> 2. The elevator layer is merging these requests, and making a
> single sweep request for contiguous sector runs.

Like always, yes.

> 3. In theory, I should be able to support page cache capability
> for NWFS and possibly NTFS in Linux the way these wierd non-Unix
> OS's work.

Maybe :-)

> 4. This interface may **NOT** support non-block aligned requests
> across all the drivers. I also need to be able to submit a
> request chain 512-2048-512-1024-4096 where the first IO requested
> may by on a non-block aligned boundry. i.e. Device is configured
> for 1024 byte blocks, I start the request as 512 @ LBA 1 -> 1024 @ LBA 2,
> etc. The code looks like it will work.

As long as the smallest unit above is at least the size of the hardware
sector on the target, it should be ok.

> I would love to test this wonderful code and will hopefully this evening,
> however, all the SCSI drivers appear to be broken, as well as the
> 3Ware. :-)

Well not all, but many. I only converted stuff I could personally test,
basically, plus a bit more. Usually converting a SCSI driver is not a
lot of work, please see the changes to sym/sym2 etc in the pre2 patch.

--
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.142 / U:4.640 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site