Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre1 | Date | Wed, 28 Nov 2001 23:39:26 +0000 (GMT) | From | Alan Cox <> |
| |
> use "BSD without advertising clause", which causes the kernel to be > tainted. Shouldn't fs/nls/*.c use "Dual BSD/GPL" or "GPL" instead?
Dual BSD/GPL is the correct one. Not a big issue. Since the GPL allows stuff to be freer than GPL but still GPL its arguably correct too I suspect - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |