lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Unresponiveness of 2.4.16
    On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 08:42:34AM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
    > On Mon, Nov 26 2001, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > > 2: The current elevator design is downright cruel to humans in
    > > the presence of heavy write traffic.
    >
    > max_bomb_segments logic was established to help absolutely _nothing_ a
    > long time ago.
    >
    > I agree that the current i/o scheduler has really bad interactive
    > performance -- at first sight your changes looks mostly like add-on
    > hacks though. Arjan's priority based scheme is more promising.
    >

    Based on pid priority or niceness?
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:3.046 / U:0.012 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site