lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Unresponiveness of 2.4.16
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 08:42:34AM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26 2001, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 2: The current elevator design is downright cruel to humans in
> > the presence of heavy write traffic.
>
> max_bomb_segments logic was established to help absolutely _nothing_ a
> long time ago.
>
> I agree that the current i/o scheduler has really bad interactive
> performance -- at first sight your changes looks mostly like add-on
> hacks though. Arjan's priority based scheme is more promising.
>

Based on pid priority or niceness?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.147 / U:1.428 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site