[lkml]   [2001]   [Nov]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Unresponiveness of 2.4.16
Torrey Hoffman wrote:
> I've running 2.4.16 with this VM patch combined with your
> 2.4.15-pre7-low-latency patch from (it applied with a
> little fuzz, no rejects). Is this a combination that you would feel
> comfortable with?

Should be OK. There is a possibility of livelock when you have
a lot of dirty buffers against multiple devices. It may
be a good idea to pick up the 2.4.16 low-latency patch.

> So far it hasn't blown up on me, and in fact seems very quick and
> responsive.
> Unless I hear a "No, don't do that!", I'm going to push this kernel into
> testing for our video applications...

If any quantitative results become available, please share...

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.057 / U:0.460 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site